You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Online First: November 9, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Special Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Health Care Reform
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Is It Time to Eliminate Consultation Codes?

An Analysis of Impact and Rationale

Joel I. Shalowitz, MD, MBA

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(1):(doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.446).

Background  As issues of health care cost escalation and parity of payment between primary care and other physicians have become more important, one proposal has been to eliminate consultation codes. Little is known about the current payment accuracy or financial impact of such a change.

Methods  To assess the impact of consultation code elimination, 2 assessments were conducted. First, from June 1, 2008, to July 1, 2009, 500 consecutive referrals from primary care physicians to other specialists were reviewed and matched with claims for accuracy of coding and billing. Second, to evaluate the financial impact of this change, year 2007 data on outpatient consultations from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were reviewed.

Results  Of the 500 claims reviewed, 466 were appropriate for analysis. Overall, the coding error rate was 32.4%. When the requesting physician ordered a consultation, the error rate was 5.5%; however, with lower paid referral requests, the error rate was 78.0%. Changing ambulatory consultation codes to those for new patient visits would save Medicare $534.5 million per year.

Conclusions  Consultation codes are being billed erroneously at a high rate. Furthermore, the differential cost to Medicare of these codes over those for new patient evaluation and management codes is over half a billion dollars per year. With the growing needs for cost savings as well as encouraging payment parity for cognitive services for primary care physicians, it is time these codes are reevaluated.


Author Affiliation: Health Industry Management, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

A Case for Consultation Codes
Paul G. Rochmis
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):836.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Case for Consultation Codes—Reply
Joel Shalowitz
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(9):836-837.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Consultations After Elimination of Payments for Evaluation and Management Consultation Codes
Hoffman and Manaker
Chest 2011;139:933-938.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Case for Consultation Codes
Rochmis
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:836-836.
FULL TEXT  

A Case for Consultation Codes--Reply
Shalowitz
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:836-837.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.