You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 1, January 12, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Hip Fracture Rehabilitation

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to Cooney's editorial "Hip Fracture Outcomes."1 Several points were made in the editorial about our investigation that were not consonant with the analysis or discussion in our article.2

We were most concerned about Cooney's suggestion that we used syllogistic logic to argue that use of physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) affects outcomes other than ambulation. He states twice in his editorial that our strongest finding was the relationship between PT/OT and length of hospital stay. Actually, in our "Results" section we clearly indicate that we found no evidence of direct effects from PT/OT on length of stay or discharge destination. We emphasized use of PT/OT in our article because it is one of the few factors influencing ambulation that is under the provider's control. Our other analyses point to the potential importance of ambulation, with or without use of PT/OT, on short and intermediate . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.