This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their article, Boyd et al¹ suggest that "older patients are significantly more likely than younger patients to have do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders written," and conclude that this association represents "age discrimination" against older patients. However, in their letter, Rosenfeld and Wenger² state that a "higher rate of DNR orders represents provider responsiveness to elderly patients' own values and preferences." We recently carried out a small study in our hospital—a community teaching hospital—to address this issue. Our data strongly suggest that the patient's preference, rather than age discrimination, is a decisive factor in obtaining DNR orders for elderly patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).

We reviewed a total of 214 adult patients who were admitted to either medical or surgical ICUs in June of 1996. Patients were divided into 4 subgroups: 18 to 64 years, 65 to 74 years, 75 to 84 years, and 85 years and older. Similar to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Lorsartan Improves Insulin Sensitivity
Federico R. Justiniani
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(9):1041.
PDF  

The Relationship Between Age and the Use of DNR Orders in Critical Care Patients: Evidence for Age Discrimination
Keith Boyd, Daniel Teres, John Rapoport, and Stanley Lemeshow
Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(16):1821-1826.
ABSTRACT