This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (7)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

It has traditionally been thought that upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is not clinically relevant when compared with iliofemoral DVT and is less likely to lead to pulmonary thromboembolism. However, recent reports have cast doubt on this assumption, concluding that up to 36% of patients with UEDVT subsequently developed pulmonary thromboembolism. Specifically, the article by Prandoni et al¹ concludes that "UEDVT is a serious thrombotic disorder that fully resembles the corresponding disease of the lower extremity," and that patients found to have UEDVT should be medically treated with anticoagulant therapy just as patients with iliofemoral DVT. We do not agree with these conclusions and are concerned that they might represent a major shift in clinical practice based on the results of a study that looked at a small number of extremely heterogeneous patients with upper-extremity thromboembolic disease.

To address this issue, we drew from our experience with UEDVT associated with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Are Bad Outcomes from Questionable Clinical Decisions Preventable Medical Errors? A Case of Cascade Iatrogenesis
Hofer and Hayward
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:327-333.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT