You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 18, October 12, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Rebuttal to Editorial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Regarding Alpert's commentary,1 the transition to managed care has to be seen as at least bittersweet. The "joys" of professional practice as Alpert remembers them were no longer affordable to a government committed to represent our national patient base. Projections were ignored, excesses were denied or explained away, and the forces of change came roaring down the track, unabated and with a vengeance.

Fear not! The pendulum will likely swing back—not all the way to the "good old days," but certainly far enough back to allow the practitioner to minister to his/her patients with a little more elbow room, consonant with the new economic realities. Fees will be a little better, but the hours and the professionalism will be exacted without diminution.

Despite the "joyless" perceptions of physicians, some good things have come about amid the "pain" of managed care; things that had no signs of developing before managed care. . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.