You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 2, January 25, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Impact of Asthma Specialists on Patient Outcomes

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The recent review by Donohoe1 on specialist and generalist care omitted important data focusing on the treatment of adults with asthma. Taken together, these studies suggest that asthma specialists provide superior asthma care, both in terms of process and outcome measures. A recent cross-sectional study2 from a large health maintenance organization found that most patients with moderate to severe asthma treated by allergists received inhaled anti-inflammatory therapy (92%), compared with less than half of patients treated by generalists (42%). Even though the allergists treated patients with greater asthma severity, their patients had significantly better measures of generic health status (SF-36), especially physical functioning and general health. Since all patients were members of the same health maintenance organization, these differences cannot be explained by differences in health care access. Furthermore, studies of adults with severe asthma as indicated by high previous health care utilization for asthma, have demonstrated improved outcomes with . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses
Martin T. Donohoe
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(15):1596-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Specialty Differences in the Management of Asthma: A Cross-sectional Assessment of Allergists' Patients and Generalists' Patients in a Large HMO
William M. Vollmer, Mark O'Hollaren, Kenneth M. Ettinger, Thomas Stibolt, John Wilkins, A. Sonia Buist, Kathryn L. P. Linton, and Molly L. Osborne
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(11):1201-1208.
ABSTRACT  

Implications of Generalists' Slow Adoption of Zidovudine in Clinical Practice
Leona E. Markson, Leon E. Cosler, and Barbara J. Turner
Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(13):1497-1504.
ABSTRACT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.