You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 22, December 13, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Data vs Opinion, Phenytoin vs Fosphenytoin

The Saga Continues

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2631-2632.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN THE IDEAL WORLD, the practice of medicine would be entirely evidence based, with decisions on how to use new medications being based on well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. One need not look further than the multibillion dollar nutritional-supplement and "natural-treatments" market to know that a considerable amount of "medical products" are consumed without a good scientific basis. The use of parenteral phenytoin, particularly in regard to fosphenytoin sodium, however, is based on good, sound scientific principles.

In the study by Meek et al,1 the authors present a rational and well-thought-out algorithm for using parenteral phenytoin products. Undoubtedly, critics of this article will cite 2 major issues when criticizing it. First, they will argue that this study, appearing in a major medical journal, is not "data driven" or evidence based. Second, cynics will no doubt question the role of Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ, the makers of fosphenytoin, as having had influence . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Guidelines for Nonemergency Use of Parenteral Phenytoin Products: Proceedings of an Expert Panel Consensus Process
Patrick D. Meek, Stephanie N. Davis, D. Michael Collins, Barry E. Gidal, Paul A. Rutecki, Aaron H. Burstein, James H. Fischer, Ilo E. Leppik, R. Eugene Ramsay, and for the Panel on Nonemergency Use of Parenteral Phenytoin Products
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(22):2639-2644.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.