You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 5, March 8, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cadaveric Organ Donation

Rethinking SPRT

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:427-428.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN THIS ISSUE OF THE ARCHIVES, Sade1 proposes a novel system for the acquisition and distribution of human organs for transplantation. His system, the Selection of Potential Recipients of Transplants (SPRT), would allow donors or relatives of a medically suitable donor to choose a category of recipient or a specific individual recipient who would receive their loved one's donated organ or organs.

The impetus for considering a change in the current system of organ procurement is 3-fold. First, many patients die while awaiting an organ. Second, the organ gap is not because of a lack of suitable donors, but a lack of actual donations from among the pool of suitable donors. The low rate of donation among suitable donors is due most commonly to denial of consent for donation by the potential donor's survivors. Third, there are many disincentives to donation, as reviewed by Sade.

SPRT's underlying hypothesis is that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Cadaveric Organ Donation: Rethinking Donor Motivation
Robert M. Sade
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(5):438-442.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.