You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 6, March 22, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (58)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Pain
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Rule of Double Effect

Clearing Up the Double Talk

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:545-550.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

RECENTLY, the rule of double effect, which has a long history in ethics, especially medical ethics, has come under serious criticism in the medical literature.1-2 Because of its immense practical importance in the care of dying patients, any attack on this rule must be taken seriously. In this article, therefore, we present a systematic rejoinder to what we take to be serious misunderstandings of the nature and use of this rule.

A clear understanding of the proper use of the rule of double effect is essential if health care professionals are to maintain their opposition to euthanasia and assisted suicide and yet provide adequate pain relief to dying patients. Many Americans, including health care professionals, are fearful of unwittingly participating in euthanasia if a patient's death is hastened, however unintentionally, as a side effect of attempts to relieve pain and suffering. For such individuals, the rule of double effect provides . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NATURE AND CONTENT OF THE RULE OF DOUBLE EFFECT

THE UNDERLYING ISSUE

LOGICAL INCONSISTENCIES WITH POTENTIALLY DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON PATIENT CARE

MISCONSTRUING DOUBLE EFFECT

DOUBLE EFFECT AND ASSISTED SUICIDE

DOUBLE TALK ABOUT TERMINAL SEDATION

WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT IS NOT AN APPLICATION OF DOUBLE EFFECT

THE DISAMBIGUATION OF CLINICAL INTENTIONS

LAW DOES NOT SETTLE THE MORAL QUESTION

RELIGION, MORALITY, AND SOCIETY

PATIENT AUTONOMY: A MORAL ABSOLUTE?

CONCLUSIONS



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Palliation or Euthanasia and End-of-Life Care: Is It in the Eye of the Beholder?
Terry and Lanken
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;178:775-776.
FULL TEXT  

An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Policy Statement: Palliative Care for Patients with Respiratory Diseases and Critical Illnesses
Lanken et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:912-927.
FULL TEXT  

The Ethics of Palliative Sedation as a Therapy of Last Resort
National Ethics Committee, Veterans Health Adminis
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2007;23:483-491.
ABSTRACT  

The Devil's Choice: Re-Thinking Law, Ethics, and Symptom Relief in Palliative Care
Magnusson
J Law Med Ethics 2006;34:559-569.
 

Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die.
Bishop
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:220-224.
FULL TEXT  

Palliative Sedation in Dying Patients: "We Turn to It When Everything Else Hasn't Worked"
Lo and Rubenfeld
JAMA 2005;294:1810-1816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics Manual: Fifth Edition
Snyder et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:560-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Internists' attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
Kaldjian et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:499-503.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emotional burden of nurses in palliative sedation therapy
Morita et al.
Palliat Med 2004;18:550-557.
ABSTRACT  

Terminal Sedation: An Acceptable Exit Strategy?
Gillick
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:236-237.
FULL TEXT  

Narcotic and Benzodiazepine Use After Withdrawal of Life Support: Association With Time to Death?
Chan et al.
Chest 2004;126:286-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Caring for the Dying in the Intensive Care Unit: In Search of Clarity
Rocker and Curtis
JAMA 2003;290:820-822.
FULL TEXT  

Withdrawal of Life Support: Intensive Caring at the End of Life
Prendergast and Puntillo
JAMA 2002;288:2732-2740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responding to Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide: "These Are Uncharted Waters for Both of Us. . . ."
Bascom and Tolle
JAMA 2002;288:91-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
Perkin and Resnik
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:164-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neuromuscular blockers--a means of palliation?
Hawryluck
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:170-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Caring for Patients at the End of Life: Facing an Uncertain Future Together
Schneiderman
JAMA 2001;286:3131-3132.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-Assisted Suicide
Snyder et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:209-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responding to Intractable Terminal Suffering
Krakauer
ANN INTERN MED 2000;133:560-560.
FULL TEXT  

Recent advances: Palliative care
Billings
BMJ 2000;321:555-558.
FULL TEXT  

Is There a Lingua Franca for Bioethics at the End of Life?
Derse
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:279-284.
 

Commentary: Double Effect-Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem
Sulmasy
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:26-29.
 

Sedation for Intractable Distress of a Dying Patient: Acute Palliative Care and the Principle of Double Effect
Krakauer et al.
The Oncologist 2000;5:53-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Euthanasia: Morals and Ethics
Matz et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1815-1815.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.