You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 11, June 12, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Faculty and Agora

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

As a physician who has served in all areas of internal medicine for 55 years, I certainly agree with Eisenberg's assessment of the academic hospital problem.1 Years ago the Macy Report showed that the cost of postgraduate education in academic medical centers was increased by the rush to have large subspecialty programs with full-time staff members and increasingly costly technology. This does equate with the need to cover educational costs with a nationwide universal health insurance system. Medical schools tend to keep the faculty with the largest research budgets and the "golden wands" that bring financial benefit to the university and are of the least direct benefit to patient care. It is difficult to get some faculty members to participate in clinical chores, and, with the exception of the annual outstanding teacher award, the clinician is less rewarded than the investigator and publisher. This parallels the clinical practice problem of . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.