Prayer and Medical Science: A Commentary on the Prayer Study by Harris et al and a Response to Critics

doi:10.1001/archinte.160.12.1735

You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

Welcome | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In

Vol. 160 No. 12, June 26, 2000

Archives
	•	Online Features

Commentary

This Article
•	Full text
•	PDF
•	Send to a friend
•	Save in My Folder
•	Save to citation manager
•	Permissions

Citing Articles
•	Citation map
•	Citing articles on ISI (7)
•	Contact me when this article is cited

Related Content
•	Related articles
•	Similar articles in this journal

Topic Collections
•	Medical Ethics
•	Randomized Controlled Trial
•	Alert me on articles by topic

Prayer and Medical Science

A Commentary on the Prayer Study by Harris et al and a Response to Critics

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1735-1738.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

It is fatal to dismiss antagonistic doctrines, supported byany body of evidence, as simply wrong. Alfred North Whitehead,1948¹

THE RANDOMIZED, controlled trial by Harris et al² on the effectsof remote intercessory prayer on outcomes of patients admittedto a coronary care unit evoked several comments from physicians.

Several respondents implied that the attempt to study the remoteeffects of prayer is wrong in principle. This is because, accordingto Dr Sandweiss,³ science deals with facts, not "miracles."Yet, if events occur in controlled laboratory studies, as suggestedby evidence cited below, these happenings presumably follownatural law and are not considered miraculous.

We should be cautious in calling events miraculous or mystical,because the subsequent course of history may reveal that theseterms reflect little more than our own ignorance. For example,when Newton invoked the notion of universal gravity in the 17thcentury to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RELATED ARTICLES

Data Without a Prayer
Richard P. Sloan and Emilia Bagiella
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1870.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Intercessory Prayer
Robert Karis and Dirk Karis
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1870.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Waiving Informed Consent for Research on Spiritual Matters?
Julie Goldstein
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1870-1871.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Prayer?
Willem Van der Does
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1871-1872.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

P Value Out of Control
Donald A. Sandweiss
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1872.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

No Effect of Intercessory Prayer Has Been Proven
Robert M. Hamm
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1872-1873.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Does Prayer Really Set One Apart?
John M. Price
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1873.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Does Prayer Need Testing?
Prakash N. Pande
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1873-1874.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Ethical and Practical Problems in Studying Prayer
Dale E. Hammerschmidt
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1874-1875.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Therapeutic Efficacy of Prayer
Fred Rosner
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1875.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Is It Prayer, or Is It Parity?
William C. Waterhouse
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1875.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Questions on the Design and Findings of a Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit
Donald R. Hoover and Joseph B. Margolick
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1875-1876.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

The Effect of Remote Intercessory Prayer on Clinical Outcomes
Jennifer G. Smith and Richard Fisher
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1876.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

Prayer Can Help
S. Milton Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1876-1877.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

God, Prayer, and Coronary Care Unit Outcomes: Faith vs Works?
Mitchel L. Galishoff, William S. Harris, Manohar Gowda, Jerry W. Kolb, Christopher P. Strychacz, James L. Vacek, Philip G. Jones, Alan Forker, James H. O'Keefe, Jr, and Ben D. McCallister
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1877.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT

| | |