You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 13, July 10, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is There Enough Evidence That Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Is Superior to Unfractionated Heparin in Pulmonary Embolism?

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this well-designed study, Hull et al1 showed 7 new episodes (6.8%) of venous thromboembolism in 103 patients who received intravenous heparin. None of the patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) group had a recurrence. Out of 7 patients, 1 patient had a subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time while receiving heparin, and 2 patients had subtherapeutic prothrombin times before or at the time of a recurrent thromboembolic event. This may be a potential confounder.

Four more patients died of abrupt metastatic carcinoma in the intravenous heparin group. Were the patients who experienced a higher incidence of recurrence of thromboembolic disease more likely to have advanced cancer? It is not clear if the recurrence of venous thromboembolism was confined only to the patients with cancer. Venous thrombosis has a more aggressive course in patients with cancer. In patients with acute calf vein thrombosis, progression to proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.