This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The recent study by Greenberg and Cello¹ reached negative conclusions regarding the opportunity to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. The authors found that, at 1 year, the change in dyspeptic symptoms was the same in the group receiving an eradicating treatment as in the placebo group. Furthermore, patients with persistent H pylori infection showed a greater, but not significant, improvement in symptoms than those with successful eradication during the follow-up.

Literature data on the role of H pylori infection in nonulcer dyspepsia are somewhat controversial. Blum et al² substantially confirmed the results of Greenberg and Cello. On the contrary, Jaakkimainen et al,³ reporting the results of a meta-analysis of 23 observational studies, recently found that for patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, dyspeptic symptoms were 90% more likely to improve compared with patients in whom the infection was not eliminated.

However, we have identified problems with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?