You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 16, September 11, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Relative Effects of Exogenous Inhaled Corticosteroids on Diurnal Cortisol Secretion

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I read with interest the recent article by Brus1 on the effects of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids on 24 hour AUC (AUC24) plasma cortisol profiles in healthy adults. A within treatment comparison for placebo at baseline vs steady state showed significant suppression for all inhaled corticosteroids except for flunisolide. This is potentially misleading because flunisolide had the lowest placebo baseline value for AUC24 cortisol, and consequently, it is perhaps not surprising that the percentage suppression would be of a smaller magnitude. Indeed, performing statistical comparisons on placebo values between the 5 treatment groups (using unpaired Student t test) reveals a lower placebo value for flunisolide vs fluticasone proprioate (P<.01), vs budesonide (P<.05), and vs triamcinolone acetonide (.05 <P< .10). Because of the confounding effects of the different placebo baseline values, it is invalid to perform between-treatment comparisons for the percentage suppression of AUC24 cortisol . . . [Full Text of this Article]



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

St John's Wort and Literature Quotations
Mennini et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1016-1017.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.