You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 20, November 13, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Convenience Survey Regarding Autopsy/Organ Donation Education at the 1999 American Medical Association Annual Meeting

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Rosenbaum et al1 report substantial deficiencies in the understanding of chief residents in medicine and pediatrics of the basics of postmortem examination and the process of receiving informed consent when requesting an autopsy. Their findings are consistent with those from a convenience survey that the American Medical Association (AMA) administered during the 1999 Annual Meeting of the AMA House of Delegates. We applaud the authors' proposed policy to improve training with the goal of higher autopsy consent rates. The results of our convenience survey follow.

Methods

The convenience survey was conducted of the medical student, resident and fellow, and young physician sections at the AMA Annual Meeting in June 1999. A total of 281 medical students, 68 residents, 20 fellows, and 85 young physicians responded. More than half of the medical students (53%) were in their second year and 22% were in their third year of medical school. Five percent of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Results

Comment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Ethics of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Halpern et al.
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:631-635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Placebo and Nocebo in Cardiovascular Health: Implications for Healthcare, Research, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship
Olshansky
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:415-421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics of Placebo Use in Pediatric Clinical Trials: The Case of Antihypertensive Drug Studies
Flynn
Hypertension 2003;42:865-869.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.