This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We were delighted to read the recent article by Gross et al¹ regarding resident preferences for morning report. We recently changed the format of our morning report and would like to share our experiences.

Our residents traditionally had a one-case style morning report, in which the presentation and management of an "interesting" patient (not necessarily the most recently admitted) were reviewed. We found that this format not only restricted the number of cases that were discussed, but also gave a false impression that only patients with rare diseases are interesting.² In addition, since the presentations of the history and physical examination were lengthy and detailed (as was the format for attending rounds), our residents' skills at being concise were not further developed.

We wanted to expand the number of cases that were discussed and provide more timely feedback on management using an evidence-based medicine (EBM) approach. We hoped to enhance . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Resident Expectations of Morning Report: A Multi-institutional Study
Cary P. Gross, Gerard B. Donnelly, Anna B. Reisman, Kent A. Sepkowitz, and Mark A. Callahan
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(16):1910-1914.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT