 |
 |

Homeopathy Wrongly Revisited?
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 142 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Having been a member of that particular panel, I was surprised to read in the article by Eskinazi1 that "the European Parliament issued a mandate to the European Commission to examine whether it [homeopathy] is beneficial. Based on the report of the Homeopathy Medicine Research Group [of which I am an author], it was recommended that homeopathy be integrated into medical practice." We did not have the mandate to examine the benefits of homeopathy, but we were asked to determine whether homeopathy was a researchable subject. Moreover, we did not recommend the integration of homeopathy into medical practice; our most tangible advice was to conduct rigorous research into this area. Perhaps others will check the rest of the statements made in Eskinazi's article, which I hope are closer to the truth than the statement quoted above.
Edzard Ernst, PhD, FRCP
Exeter, England
1. Eskinazi D. Homeopathy re-revisited: is homeopathy compatible with biomedical observations? Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1981-1987.
FREE FULL TEXT
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1375-1376.
|