 |
 |

Clinical Research Requires IRB Review
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I read the letter by Davis and Walsh1
and the response by Lawlor et al2 in the
January 21, 2001, issue of the ARCHIVES. Davis and Walsh are correct in pointing
out that any mention of oversight by a research review body was missing from
the original article. The explanation given by Lawlor and colleagues, that
the research was not more than is usually done in the clinical setting and
therefore was not subject to review when the study was developed, was an insufficient
reason for failure to obtain approval of the research protocol prior to its
implementation and regular (at least annual) oversight on an ongoing basis.
Grey Nuns Community Hospital and Health Care Centre (now Grey Nuns Community
Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta), where the study was conducted,3
has had a research steering committee since it opened in 1988, and since 1993
it has come under the jurisdiction of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Clinical and Ethical Questions Concerning Delirium Study on Patients With Advanced Cancer
Mellar P. Davis, Declan Walsh, Peter G. Lawlor, Bruno Gagnon, Isabelle L. Mancini, Jose L. Pereira, John Hanson, Maria E. Suarez-Almazor, and Eduardo D. Bruera
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(2):296-297.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Occurrence, Causes, and Outcome of Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Prospective Study
Peter G. Lawlor, Bruno Gagnon, Isabelle L. Mancini, Jose L. Pereira, John Hanson, Maria E. Suarez-Almazor, and Eduardo D. Bruera
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):786-794.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|