You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 18, October 8, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Shame on Who?

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In the March 26, 2001, issue of the ARCHIVES, Dr Manian1 laments the increasing frequency of adversarial interactions among physicians. In "Physicians vs Physicians," he decries the continuing incursion of fiscal concerns and considerations into the practice of medicine. He indicates at the beginning of his comments that he may be naive. Well, he's right; he is naive.

Like many other physicians, Dr Manian feels that we in the medical profession should simply be allowed to practice our trade with no interference from outsiders like bureaucrats and bean counters. But he finds confrontation and attack from his own colleagues to be "the most unkindest cut of all."2 Where is the camaraderie, the professionalism we grew to expect as part of the ethos of medicine?

Unfortunately, we do not practice in a vacuum. Physicians spend huge sums of money—other people's money. Understandably, the people or agencies responsible for that money are . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.