You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 2, January 22, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Genetics
 •Genetics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Genomic Medicine and the Individual Patient—Byte to Bedside

A Call for Papers

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:151.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Why should any particular person be singled out to suffer a particular disease? Patients ask, "Why me?" and the up-to-the-minute answer is provided by the media, usually with pontifical certainty and authority, "It's in your genes." And there is some truth in it.1

DESPITE THE current excitement and hubbub surrounding the mapping of the human genome, the typical busy clinician heading for the examination room is probably not thinking much about the role of genetics in the patient's problem. The clinical relevance of the Human Genome Project2, 3 is evolving but far from being established. However, it seems likely that the rapid accumulation of data on gene function will result in new approaches to patient care both incrementally (eg, diagnostic testing) and globally by "modifying medical thinking."1 Of course, genetic testing is already central to the evaluation of some conditions, such as BRCA-related breast cancer.4

The term genomics (the systematic . . . [Full Text of this Article]



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Advantages and Limitations of the Hospitalist Movement
Applebaum et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2073-2076.
FULL TEXT  

The Hospitalist Movement 5 Years Later
Wachter and Goldman
JAMA 2002;287:487-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.