You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 22, December 10, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments, Opinions, and Brief Case Reports
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Evaluation of Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2739-2740.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with regard to the morbidity and mortality of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is well known. Nevertheless, this efficacy is affected at both the individual and population levels when compliance with the treatment is inadequate.1-2 Improper adherence to HAART has been related to an increase in the viral load,3-5 which is a key element in the appearance of viral resistances.

It is therefore necessary to design tools that will allow the clinician to assess the adherence of each patient to the treatment prescribed within the consultation dynamics framework, yet the several simple questionnaires proposed have not demonstrated any utility toward this end.6 However, the proposal of Tuldra et al7 is of great interest and recommends asking patients 2 questions that examine their confidence in adhering to the treatment and the effort this can entail. Tuldra et al found that the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adherence to HAART: Why Is It So Difficult?
Paech et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1197-1198.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.