You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 13, July 8, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Better Hypertension Control? Not Without Broad Interventions by Strong Public Health Institutions

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In a recent editorial, Dr Claude Lenfant,1 a leading cardiovascular health policymaker, reflected on hypertension control in the United States. Dr Lenfant provided a lucid review of progress over the almost 30-year life of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP). He also cited the failure to reach the Healthy People 2000 goal, with only 50% of those with hypertension having their blood pressure controlled. It is a sobering fact that the actual control rates in 1994 (the latest year for which data for Healthy People 2000 are available) were far less, namely 23%, with control rates a depressing 10% in men aged 18 to 74 years.2

Almost 30 years after the start of the NHBPEP, hypertension control rates in the United States can hardly be deemed successful. Indeed, coupled with the grim picture of heart disease and stroke statistics among minorities, "lack of success" is a more appropriate . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.