You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 15, August 12, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Serum Ferritin vs Transferrin Receptor–Ferritin Index

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Rimon et al1 studied the transferrin receptor–ferritin index (TR-F index) in the evaluation of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the elderly. The authors concluded that "routine blood tests [have] a very low sensitivity" and that "the TR-F index is much more sensitive." Furthermore, they suggested that a positive TR-F index can eliminate the need for bone marrow evaluation.

Including the serum ferritin with multiple "routine laboratory tests" for IDA caused the authors to come to an erroneous conclusion. Table 1 of the article reveals that the mean ± SD serum ferritin level was 13.7 ± 5.2 ng/mL among patients with anemia and those without anemia had a mean ± SD serum ferritin level of 363.9 ± 222.2 ng/mL. A serum ferritin level of less than 19 ng/mL virtually established the diagnosis of IDA in the study group. In a study by Guyatt et al,2 the authors demonstrated that a serum . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.