 |
 |

"Defensive Medicine" and Malpractice Suits
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The role of dysfunctional physician-patient relationships in generating lawsuits is unquestionable, and the elegant article, "Reducing Legal Risks by Practicing Patient-Centered Medicine,"1 focuses on defensive medicine as a manifestation of such dysfunction and hence a marker of increased legal exposure. However, the issue is complex in that the universe of malpractice contains subsets in which rather different factors are at play. Over the last 30 years, I have reviewed more than 200 legal files of missed myocardial infarction that led to death and litigation. Typically, these consisted of cases seen in the emergency department where the patient was sent home as having "indigestion." Communication with the patient was not the issue. Reliance on tests was not necessarily defensive but rather reflected a culture in which tests constitute the only valid reality and provide professional confidence and security to the physician. Hence, dependence on normal electrocardiograms and enzyme levels, for example, . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|