You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 8, April 22, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Spiritual Informed Consent for CAM

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their discussion of informed consent for CAM, Ernst and Cohen1 neglected the issue of spiritual informed consent. By the standard of "what a reasonable patient would find material to a treatment decision," many patients are not adequately informed about the "spiritual risks" of alternative treatments.

Complementary and alternative medicine is often presented in a sterile, medical context without recognizing the rich, spiritual roots of many techniques that cannot be separated from their clinical practice. Ayurvedic medicine is intimately associated with Hinduism and transcendental meditation. Reiki uses "spiritual energy with innate intelligence" and can involve contact with "spirit guides."2 Therapeutic touch is built on the Hindu concept of prana, despite its adoption of more clinical language. Qigong and Tai Chi carry with them spiritual suppositions consistent with centuries of Chinese religious tradition. Practitioners may use a technique not inherently spiritual (such as chiropractic, acupuncture, or yoga) but apply it using . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Informed Consent in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Edzard Ernst and Michael H. Cohen
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(19):2288-2292.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.