You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 9, May 13, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"What Should I Do, Doc?"

Some Psychologic Benefits of Physician Recommendations

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:977-980.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

RECENTLY, I was speaking with an elderly patient about a small prostate cancer discovered by his urologist. The urologist recommended a course of treatment and the patient wondered what I thought about it. I explained that the "correct choice" depended on his views of the trade-off between watchful waiting and early therapy. After I explained the clinical risks and benefits of these 2 strategies, he asked me, "What would you do if you had this cancer?"

"This is your decision to make," I explained. He looked confused. "Let me try an example," I replied. "What are you going to watch on TV tonight?" "The football game," he responded. "Bad decision," I said, "You should watch the figure skating competition on channel 19 instead." He looked at me incredulously. "But I don't like figure skating." "Exactly!" I exclaimed, "I can't tell you what to watch on TV tonight because the ‘right . . . [Full Text of this Article]

THE CONTROVERSIAL ROLE OF PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS IN MEDICAL DECISION MAKING


DOES AVERSION TO HARMS OF COMMISSION EVER CAUSE PATIENTS TO MAKE BAD DECISIONS?

SOME CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS CAN IMPROVE PATIENTS' DECISIONS

ARE PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS SIMPLY PATERNALISM IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING?

THE CHALLENGE OF MAKING PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDATIONS APPROPRIATELY


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(9):1071-1072.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Educational Perspectives: Difficult Conversations in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Izatt
NeoReviews 2008;9:e321-e325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Harnessing the Power of Default Options to Improve Health Care
Halpern et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1340-1344.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence informed policy making for health communication
Stewart et al.
Health Education Journal 2005;64:120-128.
ABSTRACT  

The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry
Borrell-Carrio et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:576-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Physician-Patient Communication
Lee et al.
ASH Education Book 2002;2002:464-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.