You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 10, May 26, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

The report by Konstantinides et al1 of a randomized trial of alteplase plus heparin vs heparin alone in patients with acute PE complicated by right ventricular dysfunction, but without systemic hypotension or shock, was long awaited.

My conclusion from this important study is different than that of Mascitelli and Pezzetta. I believe that this study indicated that the safest and most cost-effective therapy for PE complicated by right ventricular dysfunction without shock is heparin with the option of secondary thrombolysis.

The bottom line of this well-performed study was that the mortality and incidence of documented recurrent PE were the same in the 118 patients randomized to receive alteplase plus heparin as in the 138 patients who were randomized to receive heparin alone, with the option of secondary thrombolysis with alteplase if clinical conditions worsened. Thirty-two of the 138 patients randomized to heparin alone received secondary thrombolysis; the other . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
Luca Mascitelli and Francesca Pezzetta
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(10):1238.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Uncertain Role of Thrombolytic Therapy in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
James E. Dalen
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(22):2521-2523.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.