 |
 |

Is Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Safer Than Warfarin for Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients?
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I read with interest the excellent recent Original Investigation by Meyer et al1 comparing LMWH and warfarin for secondary prevention of VTE in patients with cancer.
Since LMWHs are convenient and safe for initial therapy, it is only natural that they are being evaluated as an alternative to oral anticoagulants for long-term therapy in both cancer and noncancer patients, particularly in light of the high bleeding risk associated with warfarin use. However, the authors allude to the fact that long-term LMWH therapy may be safer than warfarin in patients with cancer, a point that is debatable.
The use of LMWHs as long-term treatment for VTE is attractive for many reasons. First, unlike oral anticoagulant therapy, LMWH treatment will not require laboratory testing.2 Second, a more uniform anticoagulant response is achieved with LMWHs because diet and concomitant drugs do not influence their anticoagulative effect.2 Third, the rapid onset of action and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Is Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Safer Than Warfarin for Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients?Reply
Guy Meyer and Dominique Farge
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(10):1244.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Warfarin for the Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study
Guy Meyer, Zora Marjanovic, Judith Valcke, Bernard Lorcerie, Yves Gruel, Philippe Solal-Celigny, Christine Le Maignan, Jean Marc Extra, Paul Cottu, and Dominique Farge
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(15):1729-1735.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|