This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Diagnosis  • Gastroenterology  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In the September 24, 2001, issue of the ARCHIVES, Dr Fass and colleagues¹ presented a state-of-the-art review on the evaluation and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The authors performed a thorough literature review and, using an evidence-based approach, presented an algorithm on the evaluation and management of patients with IBS.

I would like to alert the readers of this journal to new information regarding the management of IBS that has emerged since the publication of that review. In November 2002, the American College of Gastroenterology published an evidence-based position statement on the utility of diagnostic studies in the evaluation of IBS.^2-3 This position statement also included thoughtful recommendations regarding currently available medications for the treatment of IBS. Clinical trials of IBS therapies were reviewed, and a quantitative assessment of study methodology was conducted. In addition, IBS therapies were assessed for their ability to provide global relief of IBS symptoms. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Evidence- and Consensus-Based Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Ronnie Fass, George F. Longstreth, Mark Pimentel, Steven Fullerton, Simcha M. Russak, Chiun-Fang Chiou, Eileen Reyes, Paul Crane, Glenn Eisen, Bill McCarberg, and Joshua Ofman
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(17):2081-2088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT