You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 12, June 23, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Better, but Still Not Good Enough

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1392-1393.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE CENTERS for Disease Control and Prevention1 reported that approximately 1 in 4 Americans have some form of cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease, hypertension, stroke, and congestive heart failure. In 2000, 1 in 2.5 Americans died from cardiovascular disease.2 Approximately 50% of these deaths are due to ischemic heart disease. It has been estimated that in 2003, cardiovascular diseases will cost the nation $351.8 billion, including costs to the health care industry and lost productivity.2 Improvement in the prevention and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) should remain high on the priority list not only for purely health reasons, but also for social and economic reasons. In 1998, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention received funding for states to develop comprehensive cardiovascular health programs. Recommendations for preventive strategies included cigarette smoking prevention and cessation activities that address the social and marketing aspects of tobacco use, better treatment of . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

National and State Trends in Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999: The Medicare Health Care Quality Improvement Program
Dale R. Burwen, Deron H. Galusha, Jennifer M. Lewis, Marjorie R. Bedinger, Martha J. Radford, Harlan M. Krumholz, and JoAnne Micale Foody
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1430-1439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction
Gluckman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1490-1500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beta-blocker therapy and primary angioplasty: What is the controversy?
Faxon
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1788-1790.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.