You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 15, August 11, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Viral Infections
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Transplantation
 •Kidney Transplantation
 •Liver Transplantation
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Key Clinical, Ethical, and Policy Issues in the Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1773-1778.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

PATIENTS WITH human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at significant risk for end-stage kidney and liver disease, and are therefore potential candidates for solid organ transplantation.1-15 However, they have been considered poor transplant candidates. In this era of effective antiretroviral therapy, preliminary experience with transplantation appears promising, although critical clinical and ethical questions remain. Thus, it is timely to perform a safety and efficacy study of transplantation in HIV-infected patients. Key clinical issues in the design of such a study include consideration of the patients' history of opportunistic complications and hepatitis C coinfection, and their ability to tolerate antiretroviral drugs when defining selection criteria for study subjects. The ethical questions of resource allocation and the risks and benefits associated with living and cadaveric organ donation must also be carefully considered. To address the concerns of utility and effectiveness for each intervention, the minimum acceptable patient and graft survival rates must . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RESOURCE ISSUES

RISKS AND BENEFITS OF DIFFERENT DONOR POOLS

STUDY SUBJECT SELECTION CRITERIA

Example 1: History of Opportunistic Infections

Example 2: Plasma HIV RNA and Liver Transplantation

Example 3: Hepatitis C and Liver Transplantation

Example 4: Hepatitis C and Kidney Transplantation

REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES

OFF-STUDY TRANSPLANT OPTIONS

CONCLUSIONS

Michelle E. Roland, MD
Positive Health Program
Department of Medicine
University of California, San Francisco
Ward 84, San Francisco General Hospital
995 Potrero Ave
San Francisco, CA 94110
(e-mail: mroland@php.ucsf.edu)

Bernard Lo, MD; Jeffrey Braff, DrPH
Berkeley, Calif

Peter G. Stock, MD, PhD
San Francisco



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Kidney Transplantation in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy and Modern Immunosuppression
Abbott et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:1633-1639.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.