You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 22, December 8, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Physical Examination
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

What Do Good Doctors Try To Do?

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2681-2686.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

ALTHOUGH THERE are many types of good doctors, this article deals exclusively with some of the characteristics that good primary care physicians try to attain as they deliver medical care to adult patients who come to their offices. However, the concepts presented here apply regardless of where the patient is seen and are used by good subspecialists and consultants because the goal of most practicing doctors is to provide excellent medical service for the patients they attend.

Obviously, other observers of the medical scene would discuss other attributes that good primary care physicians try to attain. So what is written here is merely one observer's view.

When a good primary care physician sees a single patient, he or she tries to put aside the concern about unfair malpractice lawsuits that are driving some doctors out of the profession; the cost of modern drugs that seem to be magnified by a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

WHAT ARE THE ATTRIBUTES THAT A GOOD DOCTOR TRIES TO ATTAIN
IN THE 21st CENTURY AND WHO HAS THE TEMERITY TO LIST THEM?


THE INITIAL VISIT AND EXAMINATION

The Medical History

The Physical Examination

Other Methods of "Routine" Examination

Putting It All Together

The Use of High Technology

Communication With the Patient

After the Examination

THE SCIENCE OF MEDICINE

THE REACTION OF THE PATIENT TO THE DISEASE

THE GOOD DOCTOR'S DEMEANOR

SO WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

CONCLUSIONS

J. Willis Hurst, MD, MACP
Emory University School of Medicine
1462 Clifton Rd NE, Suite 301
Atlanta, GA 30322
(e-mail: jhurst@emory.edu)


RELATED LETTERS

Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram
Lars H. Lund
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1698.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram—Reply
J. Willis Hurst
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1698-1699.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram
Lund
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1698-1698.
FULL TEXT  

Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram--Reply
Hurst
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1698-1699.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.