You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 3, February 10, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reporting the NAFT Major Bleeding Rates in Context: Reviewers Should Include Site Investigator–Classified Rates

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their article, Strebel and colleagues1 report a systematic review assessing the relative efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins used to prevent thrombosis after total hip replacement. The authors comment that for the double-blind North American Fragmin Trial (NAFT),2 "This relatively low incidence of thrombosis is offset by a relatively high rate of major bleeding of 8.8% in the early preoperative group and 6.8% in the early postoperative group."1 The authors further note that "The rates of bleeding in both of these perioperative groups are higher" than their pooled preoperative and postoperative data or the perioperative data reported by Planes et al3 and Francis et al.4

It is important to note that NAFT was double-blind and reported bleeding rates separately based on centrally adjudicated major bleeding; site investigator–classified major bleeding; and site investigator–classified serious bleeding. Strebel et al1 have failed to include or comment on the site investigator–classified major and . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Reporting the NAFT Major Bleeding Rates in Context: Reviewers Should Include Site Investigator–Classified Rates
Niklaus Strebel, Martin H. Prins, and Harry R. Büller
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(3):369.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative or Postoperative Start of Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Elective Hip Surgery?
Niklaus Strebel, Martin Prins, Giancarlo Agnelli, and Harry R. Büller
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(13):1451-1456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

State-of-the-Art Review: Assessing the Safety Profiles of New Anticoagulants for Major Orthopedic Surgery Thromboprophylaxis
Hull et al.
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 2009;15:377-388.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.