 |
 |

Reporting the NAFT Major Bleeding Rates in Context: Reviewers Should Include Site InvestigatorClassified Rates
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 73 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
We are grateful for the comments of Dr Hull and Mr Mah. It has repeatedly been demonstrated that site investigatorclassified hemorrhage rates are lower than the rates as determined by central adjudication committees. We believe that the latter are more informative, objective, and reproducible. This is the reason why we preferred these rates in our systematic review.1
Niklaus Strebel, MD;
Martin H. Prins, MD;
Harry R. Büller, MD
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
1. Strebel N, Prins M, Agnelli G, Büller HR. Preoperative or postoperative start of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparin in elective hip surgery? Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1451-1456.
FREE FULL TEXT
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:369.
RELATED ARTICLE
Reporting the NAFT Major Bleeding Rates in Context: Reviewers Should Include Site InvestigatorClassified Rates
Russell D. Hull and Andrew F. Mah
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(3):369.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|