You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 7, April 14, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Insignificant Data Cannot Yield Statistically Significant Conclusions—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

My coauthors and I appreciate the interest of Drs Engelman and Mattes in our recent publication on dietary sodium intake and risk of congestive heart failure.1 We agree with them on the limitations of dietary data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS). However, we do not agree with them on their comments about the impacts of these biases on the study conclusion.

Drs Engelman and Mattes have reemphasized the issues that we have already discussed in our article. In summary, there are 3 major limitations with NHEFS dietary data. First, the dietary sodium intake was estimated by a single 24-hour dietary recall. This might result in misclassification of usual sodium intake at the individual level. In theory, multiple 24-hour urinary excretions of sodium provide the best estimates of dietary intake.2 However, it is not feasible to collect multiple 24-hour urinary specimens in a large population for . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Insignificant Data Cannot Yield Statistically Significant Conclusions
Karl Engelman and Richard D. Mattes
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(7):851-855.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.