You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 10, May 24, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Osteoporosis
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Osteoporosis Screening

Time to Take Responsibility

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1047-1048.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In their classic 1968 monograph, Wilson and Jungner1 defined for the World Health Organization (WHO) principles intended to serve as the basis for recommending or planning screening for early detection of a disease:

  1. The condition should be an important health problem.
  2. There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease.
  3. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available.
  4. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage.
  5. There should be a suitable test or examination.
  6. The test should be acceptable to the population.
  7. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood.
  8. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients.
  9. The cost of case-finding should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure as a whole.
  10. Case-finding should be a continuing process and not a "once and for all" project.

In 2004, osteoporosis clearly qualifies . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Daniel Mazanec, MD
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Ave
Cleveland, OH 44195
(e-mail: mazaned@ccf.org)


RELATED ARTICLES

Bone Mineral Density Thresholds for Pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Fractures
Ethel S. Siris, Ya-Ting Chen, Thomas A. Abbott, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Paul D. Miller, Lois E. Wehren, and Marc L. Berger
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1108-1112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Approach to Identifying Osteopenic Women at Increased Short-term Risk of Fracture
Paul D. Miller, Suna Barlas, Susan K. Brenneman, Thomas A. Abbott, Ya-Ting Chen, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, and Ethel S. Siris
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1113-1120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharmacist-Provided Quantitative Heel Ultrasound Screening for Rural Women at Risk of Osteoporosis
Naunton et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:38-44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.