You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 15, August 9/23, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Medication Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Time to Act Is Now

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1603-1604.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article, "Inappropriate Prescribing for Elderly Americans in a Large Outpatient Population," by Curtis et al,1 bespeaks a significant failure in the American health care system. Using a 1999 claims database of over three quarters of a million elderly subjects from a national pharmaceutical benefit manager, they report that 21% of this population filled a prescription for a drug deemed to be potentially inappropriate for this age group by an expert panel. Although the drugs included on such a list may vary depending on the views of the members of the panel, if even half that number of elderly subjects are taking potentially inappropriate medications, 1 in 10 of all older persons is receiving a drug that is potentially not appropriate. Similar studies date back at least 10 years with similar results, and little or nothing has been done to address the problem.2-3

In fact, it is likely that these . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Knight Steel, MD


RELATED ARTICLE

Inappropriate Prescribing for Elderly Americans in a Large Outpatient Population
Lesley H. Curtis, Truls Østbye, Veronica Sendersky, Steve Hutchison, Peter E. Dans, Alan Wright, Raymond L. Woosley, and Kevin A. Schulman
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1621-1625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.