 |
 |

Antiphospholipid Testing and OutcomeReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
We appreciate Drs Pechlaner and Wiedermann's interest in our article1 as well as their provocative clinical questions. Our work focused on establishing the impact of APS in the natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thus we did not analyze the utility of aPL assay in predicting an adverse outcome before the development of APS, although this would be certainly relevant for clinicians looking after patients with lupus.
The great variability of different tests to detect aPL is well known. Even more, SLE activity may induce transient positivity of aPL. However, all our patients with aPL had at least 2 positive determinationsthis was our working definition for aPL positivityand most of them had more than 2. Our aim was to identify those patients whose antibodies had a real pathogenic potential.
If we analyze 15-year survival rates according to aPL status, there is a trend toward decreased survival in . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, MD, PhD;
Maria-Victoria Egurbide, MD;
Ciriaco Aguirre, MD, PhD
Correspondence: Dr Ruiz-Irastorza, Servicio De Medicina Interna, Hospital De Cruces, Universidad Del Pais Vasco-Euskal Herriko, Unibertsitatea, 48903 Bizkaia, Spain (r.irastorza@euskalnet.net).
RELATED ARTICLES
Antiphospholipid Testing and Outcome
Christoph Pechlaner and Christian J. Wiedermann
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1701.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
High Impact of Antiphospholipid Syndrome on Irreversible Organ Damage and Survival of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Maria-Victoria Egurbide, Jon Ugalde, and Ciriaco Aguirre
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(1):77-82.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Urinary tract infections in general practice patients: diagnostic tests versus bacteriological culture
Nys et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:955-958.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|