 |
 |

Expectorated Sputum for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
A Sacred Cow
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1725-1727.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
For the diagnosis and management of community-acquired pneumonia, the routine gram staining and culture of expectorated sputum is a hallowed, time-honored tradition of dubious value. The overall recent trend has been, finally, to relegate this sacred cow of a test to the quaint pastures of history, but some steadfastly cling, with purple-stained fingers, to the hope that expectorated sputum analysis, as it is currently applied, can somehow reliably improve clinical decisions when managing patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The usefulness of this test in the management of community-acquired pneumonia has never been convincingly demonstrated in a clinical setting, and today the article García-Vázquez and colleagues1 again underscore that point.
Recent trends that favor a diminished role for sputum gram staining and culture in management algorithms and all the attendant controversies are well reflected in 2 major practice guidelines.2-3 The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, with which we agree, do not recommend . . . [Full Text of this Article]
J. Mark Madison, MD;
Richard S. Irwin, MD
RELATED ARTICLE
Assessment of the Usefulness of Sputum Culture for Diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using the PORT Predictive Scoring System
Elisa García-Vázquez, María Angeles Marcos, José Mensa, Andrés de Roux, Jordi Puig, Carmen Font, Gloria Francisco, and Antonio Torres
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(16):1807-1811.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Usefulness of Sputum Gram Stain and Culture
Musher
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:470-471.
FULL TEXT
The Utility of Sputum Analysis in Patients with CAP
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2004;2004:7-7.
FULL TEXT
Routine Sputum Culture of Questionable Value in Community-Acquired Pneumonia
JWatch General 2004;2004:2-2.
FULL TEXT
|