You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 22, Dec 13/27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Computed Tomography
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Humanities
 •Humanities, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Unregulated Direct-to-Consumer Marketing and Self-referral for Screening Imaging Services

A Call to Action

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2406-2408.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Advertising may be described as the science of arresting human intelligence long enough to get money from it.
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944), humorist and political economist

In this issue of Archives, Illes et al1 present a descriptive study of the content of a sample of direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing publications, and the findings are disturbing. Their study of 40 newspaper advertisements and 20 brochures from a variety of national and regional sources found that the DTC marketing for the industry of screening computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) frequently contains misinformation, unsubstantiated scientific claims, and fear-provoking threats and that it lacks information on uncertainties and risks associated with such imaging.

In fairness, the small sample of advertisements and brochures should not be assumed to be representative of all screening CT and MRI centers. Similar analyses from impartial scientific panels comparing advertisements with published clinical practice guidelines would be preferable to . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Patrick G. O’Malley, MD, MPH; Allen J. Taylor, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Advertising, Patient Decision Making, and Self-referral for Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Judy Illes, Dylan Kann, Kim Karetsky, Phillip Letourneau, Thomas A. Raffin, Pamela Schraedley-Desmond, Barbara A. Koenig, and Scott W. Atlas
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2415-2419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

AOA Symposium. Direct-to-Consumer Marketing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Boon or Boondoggle?
Schaffer et al.
JBJS 2008;90:2534-2543.
FULL TEXT  

The Academic Department of Surgery: Between Scylla and Charybdis
Wilson
Arch Surg 2005;140:719-723.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.