 |
 |

Establishing an Optimal Therapeutic Range for Coumarins
Filling in the Gaps
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:588-590.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Coumarins have been the mainstay of oral anticoagulant therapy for more than 50 years.1 Their effectiveness has been established by well-designed clinical trials for primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, for prevention of systemic embolism in patients with prosthetic heart valves or atrial fibrillation, for primary prevention of acute myocardial infarction in high-risk men, and for prevention of stroke, recurrent infarction, or death in patients with acute myocardial infarction.1 The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants are less clear in patients with cerebrovascular disease. In these patients, high-intensity oral anticoagulation (international normalized ratio [INR], 3.0-4.5) is associated with an unacceptable risk of intracranial bleeding,2 and low-intensity oral anticoagulation (INR, 1.4-2.8) is not more effective and is less convenient than aspirin therapy (325 mg/d).3
Oral anticoagulants have a narrow therapeutic window, and their dosage and anticoagulant effect need to be monitored carefully to maintain the INR within an appropriate range.1 . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Martin O'Donnell, MB, MRCPI
Hamilton, Ontario
Jack Hirsh, CM, MD, FRCPC, FRACP, FRSC, DSc
Henderson Research Centre 70 Wing, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 1C3
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Comparison of outcomes using 2 delivery models of anticoagulation care.
Staresinic et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:997-1002.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Search for Predictors of Nontherapeutic INR Results with Warfarin Therapy
McGriff-Lee et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2005;39:1996-2002.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Establishing an Optimal Therapeutic Range for Coumarins
Bellelli et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2282-2282.
FULL TEXT
|