You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 11, June 13, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Renal Diseases
 •Renal Diseases, Other
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Can Calcium Channel Blockers Preserve Renal Function Better Than Diuretics During Antihypertensive Treatment?—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We thank Fukuda and Kimura for their comments on our article. While we concur with them that a reduction in glomerular pressure may be renoprotective, we do not a priori accept the statement that diuretics work that way. In this regard, several arguments need to be considered.

First, many other mechanisms, including, for instance, stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, are involved in attaining a new steady state of sodium balance, when sodium intake is reduced by dietary manipulation or when sodium output is enhanced by a diuretic. The adaptation to diuretic treatment occurs swiftly and may precede any fall in blood pressure. In other words, it is not absolutely necessary to lower GFR to achieve a new steady state of sodium balance.

Second, the statement that diuretics do not affect serum sodium is too optimistic. In fact, the use of thiazides is often associated with some fall in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Peter W. de Leeuw, MD, PhD; Luis M. Ruilope, MD, PhD for the INSIGHT Investigators



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Can Calcium Channel Blockers Preserve Renal Function Better Than Diuretics During Antihypertensive Treatment?
Michio Fukuda and Genjiro Kimura
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(11):1312.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Significance of Renal Function in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk: Results From the INSIGHT Trial
Peter W. de Leeuw, Luis M. Ruilope, Christopher R. Palmer, Morris J. Brown, Alain Castaigne, Giuseppe Mancia, Talma Rosenthal, and Gilbert Wagener
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2459-2464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.