You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 12, June 27, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Physical Examination
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Annual Physical

Are Physicians and Patients Telling Us Something?

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1333-1334.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Despite a lack of evidence in support of the practice of routine annual physical examinations, it was not until 1979 that there was any consensus statement in Canada recommending against it.1-2 In the United States, such a negative recommendation first appeared officially in 1996.3 In this issue of the ARCHIVES, Prochazka et al4 report evidence that primary care physicians throughout the United States still endorse not only the concept of an "annual physical" for all adults, but also numerous screening tests for which there is no substantial evidence of utility. These attitudes persist despite an explicit recommendation from the US Preventive Services Task Force that there is insufficient evidence to support such a practice, published almost 10 years ago. A previous study by the same group about patients’ attitudes indicated that patients similarly endorse the concept of the annual physical, but much less enthusiastically when they are responsible . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Patrick G. O’Malley, MD, MPH; Philip Greenland, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

The Annual Examination: A Touchstone for Contextualized Care
Christine A. Sinsky
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(3):368.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Support of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Annual Physical Examination: A Survey of Primary Care Providers
Allan V. Prochazka, Kristy Lundahl, Wesley Pearson, Sylvia K. Oboler, and Robert J. Anderson
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1347-1352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of US Outpatient Care: Temporal Changes and Racial/Ethnic Disparities
Jun Ma and Randall S. Stafford
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1354-1361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preventive Health Examinations and Preventive Gynecological Examinations in the United States
Mehrotra et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1876-1883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The annual examination: a touchstone for contextualized care.
Sinsky
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:368-368.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians Enthused About Annual "Check-Ups"
JWatch General 2005;2005:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.