 |
 |

Diagnostic Accuracy in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Even if we agree with the conclusions of Narain et al1 that systemic autoimmune diseases are often misdiagnosed in primary care settings, exposing some of these patients to receive toxic medications, we think that the methods used do not support this assertion because of several important limitations. First, the patients were examined by 1 of 4 clinicians, of whom 2 were also the experts who decided on the final diagnosis. A correct procedure should have been an independent panel not implicated in the patients care deciding on the definitive diagnosis.
Second, some of the criteria used by the authors as gold standards to affirm the diagnosis of systemic diseases are in fact classification criteria and not diagnosis criteria. Besides the criticisms that can be made on the methods used to establish these criteria (eg, frequent selection bias due to the participation of reference centers and questionable control population), these studies . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
Bernard Goichot, MD, PhD;
Stéphane Vinzio, MD
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Diagnostic Accuracy in Systemic Autoimmune DiseasesReply
Sonali Narain, Hanno B. Richards, Minoru Satoh, Marlene Sarmiento, Richard Davidson, Jonathan Shuster, Eric Sobel, Paulette Hahn, and Westley H. Reeves
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1439.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diagnostic Accuracy for Lupus and Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases in the Community Setting
Sonali Narain, Hanno B. Richards, Minoru Satoh, Marlene Sarmiento, Richard Davidson, Jonathan Shuster, Eric Sobel, Paulette Hahn, and Westley H. Reeves
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2435-2441.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|