You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 2, January 24, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Neurology
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Coxibs, Science, and the Public Trust

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:158-160.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Merck & Co (West Point, Pa) withdrew rofecoxib (Vioxx) from the market on September 30, 2004, based on unpublished data from their own APPROVe trial (2004), a randomized placebo-controlled study of 2600 patients (mean age, 60 years) with a history of adenomatous polyps who were taking 25 mg of rofecoxib daily. Only a minority of these patients had a known history of coronary artery disease. In fact, those with ischemic events in the prior year were excluded from the study. Patients randomized to rofecoxib were found to have an approximately 2-fold increase in the rate of cardiovascular events compared with those randomized to placebo. Merck reported that this difference did not become statistically significant until 18 months after study inception.

The dramatic withdrawal of such a widely used and widely promoted drug 5 years after it was introduced to the market raises many questions concerning drug policy, scientific evidence, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

DRUG POLICY: WHAT ROLE FOR POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE?


SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE: WHAT ROLE FOR OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES OF DRUG SAFETY?

CLINICAL ISSUES: ARE OTHER COXIBS SAFE?

CONCLUSIONS: HOW CAN THE PUBLIC’S TRUST BE REGAINED?

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH; Jerry Avorn, MD


RELATED LETTERS

Inconsistency in the Editorial Process in Archives of Internal Medicine?
Nina H. Bjarnason
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1439-1440.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inconsistency in the Editorial Process in Archives of Internal Medicine?—Reply
Daniel H. Solomon and Jerry Avorn
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1440.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inconsistency in the Editorial Process in Archives of Internal Medicine?—Reply
Philip Greenland
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1440.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

The Effects of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Therapy on 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension, Osteoarthritis, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
James R. Sowers, William B. White, Bertram Pitt, Andrew Whelton, Lee S. Simon, Nathaniel Winer, Alan Kivitz, Hein van Ingen, Thomas Brabant, John G. Fort, and for the Celecoxib Rofecoxib Efficacy and Safety in Comorbidities Evaluation Trial (CRESCENT) Investigators
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):161-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Trends in Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor Use Since Market Release: Nonselective Diffusion of a Selectively Cost-effective Innovation
Carolanne Dai, Randall S. Stafford, and G. Caleb Alexander
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):171-177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Effects: An Observational Study of a Medicaid Population
Fadia T. Shaya, Steven W. Blume, Christopher M. Blanchette, Matthew R. Weir, and C. Daniel Mullins
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):181-186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Warfarin Users Treated With Nonselective NSAIDs or COX-2 Inhibitors
Marisa Battistella, Muhammad M. Mamdami, David N. Juurlink, Linda Rabeneck, and Andreas Laupacis
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(2):189-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impugning the Integrity of Medical Science: The Adverse Effects of Industry Influence
DeAngelis and Fontanarosa
JAMA 2008;299:1833-1835.
FULL TEXT  

Inconsistency in the Editorial Process in Archives of Internal Medicine?
Bjarnason
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1439-1440.
FULL TEXT  

Inconsistency in the Editorial Process in Archives of Internal Medicine?--Reply
Greenland
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1440-1440.
FULL TEXT  

Safety in Numbers -- Monitoring Risk in Approved Drugs
Okie
NEJM 2005;352:1173-1176.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.