This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The narrative by Hurst¹ ends happily: Irene, described in Hurst’s case study, agrees to compromise and stays in the hospital because of the patience and understanding of her caregivers. However much we clinicians remind ourselves to practice patience and understanding, it is worthwhile to have these cardinal values reinforced.

It is less clear to me what the caregivers should have done in the ethically challenging, unhappy case Irene continues to refuse treatment and discussion. In one scenario, which I believe Hurst endorses, "they [the clinicians] should choose a course of action as if the patient were incompetent." I assume that means that Irene is kept in the hospital against her stated will. In the alternative scenario, Irene hobbles out with active cellulitis and an uncontrolled blood glucose level.

We can better discuss the hard case if we view more flexibly conditions that Hurst describes as hard dichotomies: competence vs incompetence . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Arnold Blank, MD

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?