You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 13, July 10, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pharyngitis Management

Focusing on Where We Agree

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1345-1346.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The recent literature on adult pharyngitis has focused on the controversy surrounding the approach to patients with severe pharyngitis. This debate contrasts empirical treatment for patients meeting specified clinical criteria with treatment only for those with microbiologic confirmation. Despite their differences, competing guidelines (one from the American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine1 and one from the Infectious Diseases Society of America [IDSA]2) agree on strategies for mild pharyngitis. Both guidelines use the pharyngitis score3 as an initial screen for adult patients who complain of an acute sore throat. Both guidelines recommend neither testing nor treating patients who have scores of 0 or 1 (the score is a simple sum of the following 4 factors: history of fever, lack of cough, swollen tender anterior cervical adenopathy, and tonsillar exudates). The guidelines then disagree about testing and empirical treatment for the patients with higher scores.

This difference prompted several . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Robert M. Centor, MD; Stuart James Cohen, MD


RELATED LETTERS

Pharyngitis: How and Why
Eric L. Westerman
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2290-2291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Adults With Acute Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice
Alan L. Bisno, Michael A. Gerber, and Edward L. Kaplan
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Evaluation and Treatment of Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice: The Difference Between Guidelines Is Largely Academic
Jeffrey A. Linder, Joseph C. Chan, and David W. Bates
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(13):1374-1379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharyngitis: how and why.
Westerman
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2290-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of adults with acute pharyngitis in primary care practice.
Bisno et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2291-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Managing Pharyngitis: Guideline, What Guideline?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2006;2006:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.