You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 14, July 24, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Therapeutic Intent" in Phase 1 Oncology Trials

A Justifiable Objective

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1446-1448.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

Much has been written over the past decade regarding the ethics of phase 1 studies in patients with malignant disease.1-8 A primary focus of this literature has been on the expressed concern that patients, and often their physicians, "misinterpret" the fundamental aims of such studies, believing either consciously, or unconsciously, that participation will be of direct clinical benefit to the research subject. Rather, the argument goes, the purpose of phase 1 trials is to "determine the metabolism and pharmacologic actions of the drug in humans, the adverse effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence on effectiveness,"9 information that will hopefully be of benefit to future patients.

To support their argument, commentators have pointed to a number of analyses that documented that fewer than 5% to 6% of patients who enter phase 1 anticancer trials experience biological evidence of tumor regression (ie, "partial" or "complete" response).10-15 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

UNDERSTANDING THE DEFINITION OF PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIALS AS APPLIED TO ONCOLOGY

ADMINISTRATION OF A COMBINATION OF ESTABLISHED AND INVESTIGATIVE ANTICANCER AGENTS

ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL BIOLOGIC AGENTS THAT HAVE A HIGH PROBABILITY OF ACHIEVING TUMOR REGRESSION

PUBLISHED DATA

CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Maurie Markman, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Phase 1 Clinical Trials: Not Just for Safety Anymore?
Janardan Khandekar and Melin Khandekar
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(14):1440-1441.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Phase 1 clinical trials: not just for safety anymore?
Khandekar and Khandekar
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1440-1441.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.