This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine  • Pain  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The study by Brinkhaus et al¹ was published online in August 2003² and was also made available through German libraries free of charge also to patients. This potentially unblinding publication made public all the secret details of the study under discussion: all verum and sham acupuncture points were described in great detail. This enabled some interested patients to identify to which group (verum or placebo) they belonged, while they were probably still being followed up.

In the study under discussion,¹ 2 evaluators had to analyze patients' back pain diaries. Whenever patients made remarks in their diaries relating to the locations of their acupuncture needles, evaluators could guess to which group the patients belonged. The probability of that guess to be true was higher than mere chance when evaluators had been unblinded.

Whenever a patient mentioned that the acupuncturist inserted the needles only a little bit and that this was not . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Dieter Wettig, PhD, MD

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?