 |
 |

COMMENTS & OPINIONS
Sex Differences in the Benefits of the Guidelines Applied in Practice Project: Are They Due to Sex?
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
We read with great interest the study by Jani et al1 that examined the relative efficacy of the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) program in men vs women with acute myocardial infarction.
A previous analysis of the GAP projects in Michigan demonstrated that, overall, use of the discharge tool was independently associated with a lower 1-year mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.76; P<.001).2 In the sex-specific analysis by Jani et al,1 women treated with the discharge tool had a significant reduction in 1-year mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.79; P = .005), while only a trend toward benefit was observed in men (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.06; P = .08).
We speculate that various reasons may account for this apparent sex-related difference. As highlighted by Jani et al1 and the editorialists Greenland and Gulati,3 compared with the women in this study, men were younger, had a . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
Andrew T. Yan, MD;
Raymond T. Yan, MD;
Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Sex Differences in the Benefits of the Guidelines Applied in Practice Project: Are They Due to Sex?Reply
Kim A. Eagle, Cecelia Montoye, and Arthur Riba
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2406.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Sex Differences in the Application of Evidence-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Projects in Michigan
Sandeep M. Jani, Cecelia Montoye, Rajendra Mehta, Arthur L. Riba, Anthony C. DeFranco, Robert Parrish, Stephen Skorcz, Patricia L. Baker, Jessica Faul, Benrong Chen, Canopy Roychoudhury, Mary Anne C. Elma, Kristi R. Mitchell, Kim A. Eagle, and for the American College of Cardiology Foundation Guidelines Applied in Practice Steering Committee
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(11):1164-1170.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|