You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 21, November 27, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editor's Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

COMMENTS & OPINIONS
Sex Differences in the Benefits of the Guidelines Applied in Practice Project: Are They Due to Sex?

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

We read with great interest the study by Jani et al1 that examined the relative efficacy of the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) program in men vs women with acute myocardial infarction.

A previous analysis of the GAP projects in Michigan demonstrated that, overall, use of the discharge tool was independently associated with a lower 1-year mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.76; P<.001).2 In the sex-specific analysis by Jani et al,1 women treated with the discharge tool had a significant reduction in 1-year mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.79; P = .005), while only a trend toward benefit was observed in men (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.06; P = .08).

We speculate that various reasons may account for this apparent sex-related difference. As highlighted by Jani et al1 and the editorialists Greenland and Gulati,3 compared with the women in this study, men were younger, had a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Andrew T. Yan, MD; Raymond T. Yan, MD; Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Sex Differences in the Benefits of the Guidelines Applied in Practice Project: Are They Due to Sex?—Reply
Kim A. Eagle, Cecelia Montoye, and Arthur Riba
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2406.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Sex Differences in the Application of Evidence-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Projects in Michigan
Sandeep M. Jani, Cecelia Montoye, Rajendra Mehta, Arthur L. Riba, Anthony C. DeFranco, Robert Parrish, Stephen Skorcz, Patricia L. Baker, Jessica Faul, Benrong Chen, Canopy Roychoudhury, Mary Anne C. Elma, Kristi R. Mitchell, Kim A. Eagle, and for the American College of Cardiology Foundation Guidelines Applied in Practice Steering Committee
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(11):1164-1170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.